Supreme Court Mukesh Ambani News: The Supreme Court has given a big instruction regarding Mukesh Ambani. Since then his credibility and security will increase worldwide. Now, before killing even a bird, he will seek permission from the jawan engaged in his security. In fact, the Supreme Court has said that billionaire businessman Mukesh Ambani and his family should be provided with advance Z+ security cover while traveling across the country and abroad. A bench of Justices Krishna Murari and Ahsanuddin Amanullah said that the advance Z plus security to be provided to Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 (Ambani) would be available throughout India and has to be ensured by the State of Maharashtra and the Ministry of Home Affairs. When Ambani and his family are traveling abroad, the highest level of Z+ security should also be provided as per the policy of the Government of India and this should be ensured by the Ministry of Home Affairs.
Ambani group will bear the expenses itself
All expenses and costs of providing the highest level of Z+ cover to Ambani in India or abroad will be borne by him. The Apex Court passed the aforesaid directions observing that the security cover provided to respondent Nos. 2 to 6 has been a subject matter of dispute at different places and in different High Courts. Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Ambani, argued that he was provided with advanced level Z-plus security by the Mumbai Police and the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Central Government in view of the constant threat perception. The top court passed the order on an application filed by Vikas Saha in a Special Leave Petition to the Center challenging the interim orders of the Tripura High Court regarding the threat perception with respect to Mukesh Ambani and his family, in the Ministry of Home Affairs. was directed to produce the original files. The High Court directed that in June last year an officer of the Ministry of Home Affairs should appear in a sealed cover along with the relevant files.
Court has already canceled the action
On July 22 last year, the Supreme Court had quashed the proceedings of the Tripura High Court in connection with a PIL questioning the security cover provided to the industrialist and his family in Mumbai. However, Saha again filed a miscellaneous application seeking clarification of the July order. Counsel for the applicant argued that the order of July as it stands, leaves a lot of scope for misinterpretation of the said order, unless it is clarified that the scope of the said order is specifically to provide security cover only to Ambani. was limited to Maharashtra, which is his place of business and residence.
expressed concern about
Rohatgi submitted that his clients are at constant risk of being targeted to destabilize the country financially and such risk exists not only across India, but also when they are traveling abroad. Disposing of the application filed by Saha, the apex court said, “We are of the considered view that if there is a security threat, the security cover provided cannot be limited to a particular area and that too at the respondents’ own cost.” In view of the business activities of the Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 within the country as well as outside the country, if the security is confined to a particular place or area, the basic objective of providing security cover would be defeated.